Comparing to Nazis

I am not persuaded that Israeli soldiers are Nazis.

There is so much that separates your average soldier from an actual Nazi, just as there is so much that differentiates the Israeli state’s pointless military occupation of the West Bank and patchwork of anti-Palestinian policies, from the mobilization of an entire civilization for the express enslavement and murder of millions of people based on their ethnicity.

Even the decimation of Gaza – which stands as a permanent stain on our conscience – does not begin to approach, in intent, scope, or method, the orchestrated genocide of an entire population.

The war on Gaza, like most anti-Palestinian things the state of Israel does (and despite the words and actions of a vocal, violent minority that has found its way into the governing coalition and into positions of power over Palestinians), has been typified by an immoral disregard for Palestinian lives and property – not hatred for them or a thirst for their blood.

The difference is crucial when we’re talking about Nazis.

But the act of making the comparison itself – of holding up a mirror and seeing for ourselves if and how closely we start to resemble Nazis – is not only legitimate imho but absolutely necessary, after Auschwitz.

We SHOULD be comparing our soldiers to Nazis and seeing where there might be some similarity in tactics, outcomes, or attitudes.

We SHOULD be comparing our government to the Third Reich and seeing what policies and propaganda they might have in common.

We SHOULD be comparing our leaders to Hitler and seeing if the things they’re saying and the moves they’re making have uncomfortable, unacceptable precedent.

Because after Auschwitz, we can never, ever again let any society go down that dark path.

And the #Holocaust is the most clear benchmark we could ever use for evaluating where a society stands.

Does a country stand only 1% chance of murdering its citizens (or strangers) for the taint of their blood upon its soil?

Barukh Hashem, the disease is present but contained.

But 2% is worse than 1%.

10% is worse than 2%.

Every step along that scale is an inch closer to Auschwitz.

The abyss of the human soul.

The black whole of civilization, exerting an inexorable pull on members of society towards a collective madness born of fear and hate.

No society is totally immune to the lure of Auschwitz, the demonic promise of false justice bought for the price of human lives, of a grand future soaked in strangers’ blood.

And the worse the social conditions, the more wounded the collective and individual spirit, the easier the slide along the slope to Auschwitz becomes.

As human beings – as a species – we must always set Auschwitz before us as a memory, seared into our souls, of where we never wish to return.

We must use that memory as a guide, not just for our collective policies and institutions, but in our own personal thoughts, words, and actions.

And together, we must build the antithesis of Auschwitz – we must plant the Paradise as our answer to its Hell.

Genocide Accusation as Blood Libel

On October 7th, 2023, the Hamas military invaded southern Israel. For an entire day, they systematically murdered every Jewish person they found. Their stated goal was to join with Hezbollah forces scheduled to invade northern Israel on the same day, and together with militant cells in the West Bank successfully wipe out millions of Jewish people.

From October 7th, 2023 onward, for a period of two years, the IDF invaded, bombed, and shelled the Gaza Strip, targeting military tunnels, weapons caches, and Hamas units densely embedded and enmeshed amongst and under civilians, their homes, their schools, and their hospitals. Their stated goal was to rescue the captive Israelis that Hamas kidnapped and to destroy Hamas as an organization.

To my mind, one of these is clearly attempted genocide.

The other is not.

However, it would seem that there are many, many people – some of whom I would even count as friends – who disagree with this rather straightforward assessment.

Since October 7th, I have read and heard arguments from anti-Zionists accusing Israel of genocide in Gaza.

Not just war crimes, not even ethnic cleansing, but genocide.

While the accusation originates in authoritarian state propaganda and is largely promoted by ignorant talking heads via memes and reels, it also has the support of several academic bodies dedicated to the study of international human rights law and genocide studies (as well as a bogus pseudo-academic fake institute, but I won’t dignify them with inclusion here).

These academics published and co-signed a paper suggesting that according to the standard and accepted definition of genocide, Israel is commiting genocide against Palestinians. As proof of this claim, they cited: select statements by Israeli politicians, the “totality of evidence” of the war’s devastating impact, select instances of IDF soldiers targeting civilians, and the widely-circulated casualty statistic claiming that roughly 3% of the population was killed.

Based on this paper, co-signed by several reputable academic centers for genocide studies, I am supposed to believe that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza.

If I don’t accept this supposed consensus, then apparently I am a “genocide denier.”

🤔

Here’s why I am not persuaded by the argument.

1. Cherry-picking statements from hyperbolic politicians who ALSO made many statements asserting the goal of self-defense and the need for humanitarian aid for Gazans, completely fails the standard of the “only possible interpretation” of these statements being genocidal intent.

2. The recourse to the “totality of evidence” in the alleged absence of direct evidence of genocidal intent is completely unnecessary: the direct evidence available – in the form of all the measures the IDF took to protect Gazan life, from sending warning phone calls and leaflets to evacuating civilians to literally scheduling airstrikes in advance – indicates that there was no genocidal intent.

3. While over 70% of the Gaza Strip was reduced to rubble, only 3% of the Gazan population was killed in this war. The wild disparity between these two percentages indicates that rather than wantonly disregarding Gazan life, let alone targeting Gazans for slaughter, the IDF waged war in a densely-packed urban setting without genocidal intent.

4. Gazans are not a separate religious, ethnic, or national group. They are part of the Palestinian people. While Gazans were dying from Israeli airstrikes by the thousands, millions of Palestinians across Israel were completely safe from any threat of genocide; in fact, they were in greater danger from rockets and missiles from Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran. While military measures in the West Bank intensified and settler crimes against Palestinians increased, there was no genocidal targeting of Palestinians as a religious, ethnic, or national group at any point in the past two years.

5. As mentioned above, only 3% of the Gazan population died in this war. That number is not just civilians – it includes Hamas soldiers. And the fact that, on analysis, it actually *disproportionately* includes Hamas soldiers as opposed to, say, children (roughly half the population), indicates not only a lack of genocidal intent but a lack of genocidal *outcome*.

Kappara, this war has been undeniably devastating for Gazans.

The question itself of whether we have committed genocide or come close to committing genocide, is a valid question.

The debate itself in international human rights law regarding the meaning, nature, and definition of genocide, is a valid debate.

It is also clear that the IDF did not always follow its own policies and it may even be that war crimes were committed over the past two years.

Israel is a democracy dedicated to the rule of law, and we can and should investigate everything that needs investigation.

Howthebleepever.

The accusation of genocide, in light of the evidence, is a blood libel.

Its origins, its memes, its subtext, its imputation of ultimate guilt, its baselessness, make it a blood libel.

Not everyone who believes it is a rabid antisemite – but everyone who believes it has bought into modern antisemitism on some level. Including those Jewish people who support, repeat, and insist on the truth of the libel.

As I’ve written previously, I believe that Zionism must reckon with the devastation of Gaza, and that a new future must be built from the ashes of both Beeri and Gaza. And as anyone who has read my posts knows, I’m the last one to place the Israeli state, government, or military beyond criticism.

But the truth is the truth.

May the genocides actually occurring right now across the world be swiftly stopped, and may the world know no more genocide.

May a just peace come to this land and may Palestinians and Israelis together take the right steps forward towards a shared future of liberty, equality, and security for all.

Armenian Genocide Statistics

TIL the statistic that 60-65% of the Armenian population was killed in the Armenian genocide. 1.5 million people out of a population numbering a few hundred thousand larger than Gaza’s before the war.

Statement on the Discourse of Genocide

Statement on the Tiktok Discourse of Genocide in Gaza

The Mt. Zion Bureau of Public Affairs affirms the responsibility of every sovereign state, including Israel, to conduct military operations in accordance with international humanitarian law. We recognize that the current war in Gaza has caused profound suffering and immense civilian loss of life. Allegations of war crimes—including disproportionate use of force, attacks in densely populated areas, and restrictions on humanitarian aid—must be addressed with seriousness and transparency. We call for rigorous review and accountability where violations may have occurred.

At the same time, we categorically reject the accusation that Israel is engaged in genocide against the Palestinian people. Genocide, as defined by the 1948 UN Convention, requires intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. Israel’s stated and operational objective is the destruction of Hamas as a terrorist organization responsible for the October 7 massacres, kidnappings, and continued rocket attacks on Israeli civilians. The tragic civilian toll of this war reflects the brutal reality of combat against an enemy deliberately embedded in civilian areas—not an exterminatory policy against Palestinians as a people.

We further note that Israel remains home to nearly two million Arab citizens who participate fully in the civic, political, and social life of the state. Their continued security and integration stand in stark contradiction to claims of genocidal intent. Where inflammatory rhetoric by individuals has strayed into language suggestive of extermination, such speech has been condemned within Israel’s political and legal system and does not reflect state policy.

The charge of genocide is not simply a legal question. It carries with it a historical echo. For centuries, Jews have endured false collective accusations—blood libels, deicide, dual loyalty—meant to strip them of legitimacy and justify violence against them. To misapply the label of genocide to Israel’s self-defense risks repeating this pattern: collapsing the distinction between the Israel Defense Forces, the State of Israel, and Jews worldwide, and recasting Jewish survival itself as a crime.

We therefore call upon the international community to distinguish between legitimate investigation of alleged violations of the laws of war and the politically weaponized discourse of genocide. The former is essential for the integrity of international law. The latter undermines it.

Israel will continue to defend its citizens against genocidal threats, as it has since its founding, while striving to uphold the standards of law and morality upon which its legitimacy rests.

– Mt. Zion Bureau of Public Affairs

Devastation of Gaza

The devastation of Gaza can still shock and pain me, as a thinking and feeling human being and as a religious Zionist, and pose a collective challenge to Israeli society that demands a coherent answer, without any need to redefine genocide in order to make it fit the horrific impact of this war on the lives of ordinary Gazans.

Is this how we want to wage war, as a nation?

And what does God say??

If the settled law is not enough, if the poseqim have no creative vision for this day, then Elul is here – according to kabbalistic legend, the transcendent king is accessible in the field of the heart’s imagination.

Pray on this then, and hear what our Creator speaks unto your heart.

On Platforming Hatemongers

Attention New York synagogues and Jewish schools, museums, and community centers:

You can not feign outrage over accusations of genocide and then eagerly platform and fawn over an Israeli parliamentarian who has repeatedly called for genocide.

Defending his mob of fans’ thuggish and racist behavior because you “understand the context” is really a self-own in the context of our struggle with the Iranian axis in the court of public opinion.

Have more respect for our soldiers than that.

Have more respect for yourselves than that.

The Chapter 9 Project

Belated, but: I’ve been catching references to the “Chapter 9 Project,” which seems to have become linked by some pundits to a modern blood libel, accusations of genocide committed by Jewish Israelis against Palestinians in Gaza.

I respect many aspects of the more progressive denominations of Ashkenazi Judaism, but this project and the association that has developed between it and the recent war in Gaza seems extraordinarily vapid. (And no, Prof. Leibowitz doesn’t get a pass on promoting the basis for this weird reading, back in his day.)

The Persian Empire, under the reign of Xerxes, contained some 49 million people. Chapter 9 of the book of Esther records that the Jewish people killed some 75,000 people across 127 countries, people who themselves were not targeted for elimination but killed (in self-defense) by the actual targets for elimination by an actual governmental edict. For those who are as bad at math as I am, 75,000 is far less than 1% of an imperial population of 49 million. That is not genocide.

On a completely unrelated note – and it should be stressed how unrelated this point is, and how laborious and contrived its linkage is to the above – while no confirmed number exists, higher estimates suggest that some 48,000 Gazans have died over the past 1.5+ years of this misbegotten war, out of a population of just over 2 million. That’s roughly 2.5% of the population – a much greater percentage than that of the Persian Empire above, but still not nearly a genocide.

For a frame of reference, 60% of Europe’s Jewish population was killed in the Holocaust and 77% of the Tutsi population was killed in the Rwandan genocide.

Just Say No To Propaganda, People

Blood Libel vs The Facts

If the IDF wanted to genocide Palestinians, the war would have been over within a week. The Palestinian populations of Israel and the West Bank would be gone.

The facts are that while the airstrikes have been devastating for Gazans…

…the death rate (less than 1 out of 100, and that’s INCLUDING Hamas fighters) hasn’t been anywhere near the destruction rate (1 out of 2 buildings in Gaza city and north Gaza).

…the civilian-combatant death ratio (2 civilians lost for every combatant killed) is nearly unmatched in modern warfare DESPITE Hamas deeply embedding their weapons and fighters among civilians.

…the humanitarian corridors are still provided by the IDF DESPITE Hamas continuing to fire rockets from them at Israeli and Palestinian civilian populations across central and southern Israel (including the West Bank).

These are facts, whether they fit your tiktok narrative or not.

What’s going on in Gaza is terrible but calling it genocide is a blood libel.