So in other news this weekend, I read some convincing critiques of the theory of the development of complex structures and speciation via blind selection of (even path-limited) randomly-generated possibilities. 🤷 I still think Dawkins is a great zoology writer but I’m no longer convinced the Modern Synthesis is a reasonable explanation of the biosphere. First in physics, now in biology: I’m finding that something analogous to design (read the Guide for the Perplexed before you @ me) is actually the most parsimonious explanation of the available data.
Who says we can’t change our minds. 😀